Friday, May 19, 2023

Philosophical Objectives Of The Representarian Party- Part Twenty-Three

Philosophical Objectives Of The Representarian Party- Part Twenty-Three If a judge pressures an individual to hire an attorney at-law because that officer of the court is familiar with procedures, that individual needs to cite the Judiciary Act of 1789. It clearly states that COURT SHALL NOT DENY FOR WANT OF FORM - "AS ANY REASONABLE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND". This language that should be included in the papers one writes to the court. Sui Juris is the sovereign status an individual, particularly a citizen, should claim in any court. The courts may initially refuse to acknowledge this or may initially try to dismiss that individual's case. One of their favorite ruses is "denied for want of form". This language, from the First Congress in 1789, clearly outlines the intent of what a court is to be and that the court is "deemed to know the law" and must assist sovereign people in our courts to plead their cases before a jury of their peers as they see fit to plead our cases. The court works for the People to protect the basic rights of the individual(s). It has NO discretion to refuse to hear cases of deprivation of rights and criminal injury. The Court functionaries know all this; they just continue to do this as long as the People let them. Use this language and make them state that this is NOT the law. Then ask what jurisdiction they have for this court if this language does not apply. This IS the law and this stands. The Writ SHALL not be dismissed for lack of form or failure of process. All the pleadings must be is as any reasonable man/woman would understand. Clearly written, affidavits of facts and law. Use this under "jurisdiction" in the Complaints you write. "And be it further enacted. That no summons, writ, declaration, return, process, judgment, or other proceedings in civil cases in any of the courts or the United States, shall be abated, arrested, quashed or reversed, for any defect or want of form, but the said courts respectively shall proceed and give judgment according as the right of the cause and matter in law shall appear unto them, without regarding any imperfections, defects or want of form in such writ, declaration, or other pleading, returns process, judgment, or course of proceeding whatsoever, except those only in cases of demurrer, which the party demurring shall specially sit down and express together with his demurrer as the cause thereof. And the said courts respectively shall and may, by virtue of this act, from time to time, amend all and every such imperfections, defects and wants of form, other than those only which the party demurring shall express as aforesaid, and may at any, time, permit either of the parties to amend any defect in the process of pleadings upon such conditions as the said courts respectively shall in their discretion, and by their rules prescribe (a)" Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789, Section 342, FIRST CONGRESS, Sess. 1, ch. 20, 1789

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home