Genuine Reforms Cannot Come From Aristocratic Insiders
Dear Citizen, November 2008
In regards to last month's article about a conviction of a Covington,Virginia auctioneer/car dealer, these following comments must be expressed.
According exclusively to newspapers articles posted on the Internet,bank board member Tommy Garten was not materially involved in the acceptance and in the deliverance of illicit money nor in the extension of loans to the other defendant in this matter, Kevin O’Brien. Garten had no involvement in O'Brien's business affairs. It appears he is being punished for expressing an opinion.
No one actually should be surprised at these brutal tactics.At least in most “Police States” throughout the world, these elements of arrant nonsense do not exist. One knows what to expect in these third-world nations. In America, no one knows when he or she is “crossing the line” until it is too late.
At least in other openly tyrannical nations,wealth is not openly a motivating factor in their police-state implementation.
There is no surprise that Garten was targeted in West Virginia, which unfortunately is known for its third-world status. He could be perceived as a moneyed interest. In addition, if one rubs the PTB the wrong way, that individual can and will be a target. Trial Judge Johnston clearly demonstrated partiality and bias by citing that Garten had previously brushed against illegal activity.For a judge to cite something that is both irrelevant, unproven, and prejudicial is clearly a violation of judicial cannons, sound jurisprudence, and the U.S. Constitution.
Many say work within the system.However,if a system is so infected with
absolutism that stand-alone merits no longer matter, then genuine reform will not come from aristocratic insiders. It must come from outside the system.Non-cooperation with something that is not just fundamentally oppressive but
basically not workable is a must. Once active collaboration with repression takes
place, all measures of reform are compromised.
This letter is not expressing what Garten did was moral or ethical.There are not sufficient facts to make a definitive conclusion.However,it should definitely not be illegal.
Judge Johnston lamented that too many bankers are solely motivated by money and cases like this give lawyers a bad name. A remark like this is analgous to the kettle calling the pot black.What about the current legal profession? Do they overall work for a higher cause or higher standards. Hardly! Rather, they collectively have the mentality,modalities, and morality of wild beasts!
It is totally hypocritical for Bar attorneys, who do and charge as they please, are
allowed to pass judgment on those who try to create wealth.
Very Truly Yours,
Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington,Virginia 24426
In regards to last month's article about a conviction of a Covington,Virginia auctioneer/car dealer, these following comments must be expressed.
According exclusively to newspapers articles posted on the Internet,bank board member Tommy Garten was not materially involved in the acceptance and in the deliverance of illicit money nor in the extension of loans to the other defendant in this matter, Kevin O’Brien. Garten had no involvement in O'Brien's business affairs. It appears he is being punished for expressing an opinion.
No one actually should be surprised at these brutal tactics.At least in most “Police States” throughout the world, these elements of arrant nonsense do not exist. One knows what to expect in these third-world nations. In America, no one knows when he or she is “crossing the line” until it is too late.
At least in other openly tyrannical nations,wealth is not openly a motivating factor in their police-state implementation.
There is no surprise that Garten was targeted in West Virginia, which unfortunately is known for its third-world status. He could be perceived as a moneyed interest. In addition, if one rubs the PTB the wrong way, that individual can and will be a target. Trial Judge Johnston clearly demonstrated partiality and bias by citing that Garten had previously brushed against illegal activity.For a judge to cite something that is both irrelevant, unproven, and prejudicial is clearly a violation of judicial cannons, sound jurisprudence, and the U.S. Constitution.
Many say work within the system.However,if a system is so infected with
absolutism that stand-alone merits no longer matter, then genuine reform will not come from aristocratic insiders. It must come from outside the system.Non-cooperation with something that is not just fundamentally oppressive but
basically not workable is a must. Once active collaboration with repression takes
place, all measures of reform are compromised.
This letter is not expressing what Garten did was moral or ethical.There are not sufficient facts to make a definitive conclusion.However,it should definitely not be illegal.
Judge Johnston lamented that too many bankers are solely motivated by money and cases like this give lawyers a bad name. A remark like this is analgous to the kettle calling the pot black.What about the current legal profession? Do they overall work for a higher cause or higher standards. Hardly! Rather, they collectively have the mentality,modalities, and morality of wild beasts!
It is totally hypocritical for Bar attorneys, who do and charge as they please, are
allowed to pass judgment on those who try to create wealth.
Very Truly Yours,
Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington,Virginia 24426
posted by Harsha Sankar at 3:24 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home