Representative Democratic Model- Selectable Offices Part Thirty-Six (Session Two) Balance Of Power In Democratic Models- Chief Justice Of Main State Appellate Courts
Representative Democratic Model- Selectable Offices Part Thirty-Six (Session Two)
Balance Of Power In Democratic Models- Chief Justice Of Main State Appellate Courts
The State Appellate Court which handles criminal cases per law is more insulated from the People than the State Appellate Court which handles civil (dispute resolution) cases per equity. Imagine if their Chief Justice was originally selected through bid submittals by the Speaker Of the House of Delegates/Assembly instead of by the majority of members of that specific lower house. That Chief Justice would be more insulated that he/she should be. He/she would be too aloof from the basic needs and rights of the People. That State Appellate Court that this Chief Justice presides over would be too Imperially Democratic and would be too distant from the People to properly protect their basic rights and needs.
A government entity that is too homogeneous will become too autonomous. That breeds tyranny because of the polarizing factor.
Cliff
Notes Version: The State Appellate Courts which deal with criminal
cases per law are more insulated from the People than State Appellate Courts
that deal with civil (dispute resolution) per equity cases.
Therefore,
their Chief Justice should be selected in a manner that is more
connected to the People. If not, he/she would be too distant from the
People to properly protect their basic rights and needs.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home