Snopes Cannot Be Trusted(Alec Baldwin Matter)- October 2021

Snopes and others are now debunking the tweet by Halyna Hutchins as false. That tweet cited that Hutchins basically had incriminating information on Hillary Clinton. Perhaps that tweet was false and it did not come from Ms. Hutchins. They claim it was false but how would they know that for certain?

The problem is are these "Independent Fact-Checkers" doing research on it to make sure that it false or they just claiming that it’s false without documented research. It must be noted these "fact-checkers" claimed in Spring 2020 that "C-19" came from the Wuhan wet markets. Just because there is a strong possibility something could be false does not automatically mean it is false.

Why are the fact-checkers so aggressively pursuing this? Again, how would they know for certain if that tweet came from Halyna Hutchins or from someone else who hacked her account? Moreover, why would anyone want to hack her account prior to her death by shooting?

For the last week, it has been incorrectly asserted that a prop gun was used in Baldwin's discharge. It is now being revealed that it was a regular gun. It gets stranger by the minute. Also, the media and authorities keep alleging that it was an accident. At this point in time, how can "Foul Play" be ruled out? Snopes claims it was a doctored tweet and that there are no traces of it online. They definitely contradict themselves when they cite this. Furthermore, Snopes cites that this account’s timeline is blank, and archived versions of this account show no posted tweets.

Of course anyone associated with the Clintons would use their authority to make certain this would be the case. Any hacker can obtain passwords. Snopes cites that Halyna Hutchins' account was started in April of this year and yet they claim that this account is not verified. Again, another contradiction.

Snopes finally states that "it seems likely that this tweet was created with one of several 'fake tweet' generators". Yet the very fact they used the words "seems likely" means they are not certain this is the case. If they are not certain that this meme came from fake sources, how can they be so certain that it did not come from real sources? The truth is they do not know one way or the other the legitimacy of that tweet.

No one is questioning the time and date in which that tweet was posted. It was definitely posted before Hutchins' death. Why would anyone fake a tweet on her behalf considering she was a non-prominent "nobody", especially in politics , prior to her shooting death? At this point in time, that tweet has to be accepted as legitimate until something really conclusive proves it otherwise. Hutchins was not even an actress in the movie. Why was she the target?

For what it is worth, Baldwin is a staunch HRC supporter!