Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Black Robed Despots-(A Harsha Sankar Article)

Dear Citizen, December 8th, 2003


The bar associations and its collaborators,in order to advance their agenda of domination,would like to label complaints about the legal system as fundamentally unjust and as statements that come from a fringe element. However, it is the legal system itself,controlled by the demagogic legal profession, that is indeed the home of extremism,absolutism,&intolerance.

One small example is the unconscionable fee(nearly a million dollars) public defenders charged the Virginia taxpayers to represent murderer John Allen Muhammed in the preliminary hearings.Yet when Muhammed, obviously guilty based on forensic evidence,tries to exercise his 1st Amendment Right to present his claim, he is disparaged as mentally irregular,foolish,and arrogant for his "attempt to play lawyer".

With judges now making law, the American republic is being torn apart and democratic institutions are being pushed into extinction. The judiciary has now decided that the reference to God in the pledge of allegiance, that Floridian parental notification about minors' abortion, that the passed referendum calling for the increase of legislature votes needed to raise Nevadan taxes, that Michigan laws treating students(regardless of race) the same, that laws prohibiting same-sex marriages, are all unconstitutional. These are just a few examples of the lunacy Americans experience.

Do the other branches check the unlimited powers of the judicial oligarchy? Of course not simply because they are manned by the same people. The new repressive theocracy, the legal profession, have converted lawmakers into lawbreakers and America's democracy into their kleptocracy. This permeation will polarize our nation into the co-operative exploiters and the voiceless exploited. Irrespective of who wins or loses, the ruling class will have its mandates and pound of flesh. The people, no longer answered to by its own government, are now compelled to anwer to the capricious decrees of these black robed despots.

The notion the court has the final say on the meaning of the law and Constitution is nowhere to be found in the thoughts of the Framers or the text of the Founding document. Despite Federalist 78, the Declaration Of Independence, the Constitution itself, and pure common sense, the bar has arrogated such extreme powers to the courts. The Framers limited the courts just as they did with the other two branches. Congress,under the Constitution's "exceptions clause" in Article III, Section 2, and also in Federalist 8, can put specific matters beyond the reach of grasping judges. Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, and Lincoln, in the Dred Scott case, refused to carry out the courts' decision. Lincoln cited people would cease to rule themselves and would resign their government into the hands of judges.

Now judges are trying to internationlize our law, which threatens American independence at its core. The fiction of judicial supremacy, often cloaked as the high-minded though self-serving assertion of "judicial independence," caters to rogue behavior. This is not compatible in a progressive and merit-based society. It will make jurists into demigods with celebrity status and will turn simple court cases into drama and entertainment for the masses.

It must be remembered it was a jury(mob), manipulated by the "lawyers"(clerics), that exonerated a murderer of one man and instead had a certain individual executed because the jurors were convinced his heresy, sedition, and radicalism threatened their entire survival. That individual's name was Jesus. While judgement came from his peers, does that mean it was right? Apparently society in the 21st century has not grasped that particular history lesson.

Either Americans purge this tyranny or this tyranny will purge America.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington, Virginia 24426

"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"
- Tacitus

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home