Representative Democratic Model- Selectable Offices Part Thirty-Seven (Session Two)-Role Of The Federal Courts (U.S. Circuit Courts,Federal Intermediary Appellate Courts)

Representative Democratic Model- Selectable Offices

Part Thirty-Seven (Session Two)-Role Of The Federal Courts (U.S. Circuit Courts, Federal Intermediary Appellate Courts)

People need to understand how the federal appellate courts should work. Those courts are not the place for U.S. District court cases should be retried. Instead a simple format must be followed by both the appellant and respondent.

The appellant must outline the specific reasons why the United States District Court's decision/opinion/verdict should be overturned. He/she should cite specific errors or other inappropriate acts by the federal trial court (judge and/or jury) as a basis for the federal intermediary appellate court to overturn and set aside the findings of guilt or liability. 

The appellant should also do the same if he/she requests the federal intermediary appellate court changes the sentencing in criminal cases or awards/relief in civil liability cases. In other words, the appellant does not have to differ with the trial court's finding of guilt and/or liability. He/she just can just differ with the amount of criminal case punishment or civil case damages if needed. 

The appellant must send a certified copy to the opposing litigant, the respondent. The respondent must reply to the specific outlined statements by the appellant. He/she must send that formatted response to the appellate court and also to the appellant. 

Cliff Notes Version: Federal Intermediary Appellate Courts overturn lower court decisions if the federal trial courts acted inappropriately and/or in error.