Commentary On Elections-Part Seventy

This commentary depicts why at the legislative level cross-verification should not apply.

The following depicts the need for elected federal lower house representatives to be chosen by the People in a balanced manner. All willing eligible voters of each locality cast their ballots for their choice of federal lower house representative. Localities (city or county) then cast all its assigned electoral vote(s) for its most popular candidate of a legislative house. The assignment of electoral votes to each and ever locality should be based on the same democratic model as the federal legislative house that electors of each and every locality vote for.

In other words since the assignment of electoral votes is population-based, the federal lower legislative house that the localities cast its votes to choose those house's members should also be population-based.

The assignment of electoral votes to each locality which holds election for seats in the US House of Representatives is population-based because this federal lower legislative house is indeed based on a population-based model.

Cross-verification is an important component of checks and balances for head executives at the state and federal level but not for lawmakers at either level. The two specific types of chambers of the bicameral legislature at either the state and federal levels should either be area-based or population-based.

Plainly put the upper house at the state and federal level should be based on an area-based democratic model and the lower house at the state and federal level has to be based on a popular-based democratic model.