Sociopathic Shysterism Has Claimed Engineering Disclipines As Its Casualties-(A Harsha Sankar Article)

Dear Citizen, November 2010

As the attorney/lobbyist revolution continues unabated,
perpetuating“sickness”of nearly all sectors at an
escalating rate and reducing Americans to dependency,
one such casualty are careers in engineering.

As America’s best college students flock to the fields
of predatory/parasitic/marginaliststudy and as too many
other students,particularly women, herd towards nursing,
engineering disciplines are not attracting interest.
Despite substantial starting salaries(new graduates
earned on average $53,170),the annual growth rate is
–2.2 percent. Even with the internet revolutionizing
lifestyles, computer science accounts for just 3.8
percent of bachelor’s degrees conferred and their
annual growth rate is –0.6 percent.

While China and India graduate more than half a million
engineers and scientists annually, the total number of
graduates in America is only 60,000.

The preceding is one big reason why

1) America has not built one refinery since 1976

2) America has not built one nuclear plant since 2000

3) From 2000-2005, not a single manufacturing payroll
classification created a single new job.

4) USA has lost approximately 42,400 factories and 32
percent of manufacturing jobs since 2000. In 1959,
manufacturing represented 28 percent of economic output.
In 2008, it represented 11.5 percent.

5) Manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer
industry is lower in 2010 than it was in 1975.

6) America's trade deficit with China increased 300 percent
in last ten years,which could cause eventually the loss of a
million jobs this year alone.Half a trillion yearly leave America
due to trade deficit.

7) Intel CEO Paul Otellini stated it costs $1 billion more per
factory for Intel to build, equip, and operate a semiconductor
manufacturing facility in the United States.

8) 75% of all corporate profits increase in third quarter 2010
went to financial institutions that workers bailed out with tax
dollars rather than manufacturing and other productive sectors.

As productive people,small businesses, and small investors are
in dire straights,real estate and foreclosure "law" has become
a very lucrative field for the unconstitutional BAR. So many Americans
have been forced to take on a second mortgage just to pay their
attorney. Either the ransom money is paid or homes will be lost.

Solely blaming attorneys and the bureaucracy is a cop-out. However,
it is the systems that their rule,dictates,and fiat has set up
that is to blame.The healthcare system, the financial markets
system, and the education system are all predicated on the
legal system. They all deserve an F for failing the American people.

Americans lost their prosperity when they lost their freedoms.
Americans lost their freedoms when they allowed Sociopathic
Shysterism to overrun their nation. There is no mention of
attorney or even lawyer in the Declaration of Independence
or the US or state constitutions. Yet Americans have allowed
themselves to be degraded to such abject submission.

Yet Americans continue to vote for the illegal BAR
attorneys as politicians. It is simply the case of not
seeing the forest because the trees block visibility.

Tweetle-dum vs.Tweetle-dee is not the answer. A myriad
of rules,regulations, and economic incentives keep
grassroots Americans from vying for office. This must change.
Otherwise America will continue to sink into this abyss.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Raod
Covington,Virginia 24426

Third-World Governance Means Third-World Economic & Social Status In America-By Harsha Sankar

January 2011

Dear Citizen,

America society is breaking apart. Millions of people have lost their jobs and fallen into poverty. Please review the stats:

1. 43 million now receive food assistance. No European Union nation humiliates its
disadvantaged citizens in the checkout line. Yet the rolls are growing. 6 million were added over the last year.

2. The chasm between the very rich and the poor has never been this big. A distant
second in income inequality would be the Great Depression era.

3. 72 million wage earners made $ 25,000 or less per year. One third of all Americans had zero dollars in a retirement account.

4. From 1950 to 1989 the top one percent earned roughly 7 to 8 percent of national
income. Today it is close to 20 percent.

5. While 42 percent of financial wealth is controlled by 1 percent, 3 million families have lost their homes in 2009 and real unemployment is well over 20 percent.

6. The bottom 80% control only 7% of financial wealth. With as many as 600,000 jobs
evaporating monthly, how many Wal-Mart shoppers of groceries are staring at the
spectacular gains of Wall Street private equity? How many coupon cutters will be impressed by the fact that ‘Banksters” received 10 trillion dollars from Federal Government in 2009?

7. Between 1979 and 2004, the after-tax income for the top 1 percent skyrocketed
176 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 20 percent managed a 6 percent gain.

Obviously the rich over getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Anyone can arrive at that simplistic assessment. Yet when the median income for the Senate alone was an astonishing $2.38 million, how responsive will elected officials be if they are beneficiaries of a plutocratic status quo? No one begrudges anyone for becoming wealthy, provided they are freely creating wealth and value for others. Yet parasitism rules the day.

The American dream can be transitioned to living in a car with the loss of one pay check.

What America is witnessing is a common attribute of Latin America and that is the creation of a stunningly wealthy upper crust of society and the large working poor majority. The middle class and the entrepreneurial class are virtually non-existent.

So what is the solution? No one or no group should try to micromanage America
from this situation. America is headed for permanent third–world economic and social
status because America has third–world governance. While so many erroneously proclaim that cheaper labor of other nations is the culprit of America’s decline, Intel CEO Paul Otellini said 90% of additional costs is not due to higher labor rates, but from higher taxes and regulatory charges which other nations do not impose.

Same-hands governance is third world governance. Ban attorneys from office. Otherwise these obscene inequities will perpetuate cataclysmic events. One example is the Lehman Brother’s bankruptcy in September 2008. One billion dollars so far have been paid to attorneys, advisers, and bankers involved in litigation. Creditors continue to wait in the cue for their due.

BAR Imperialism is rotting the soul of America. Americans must reverse the decline.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington,Virginia 24426

Transparency Must Never Be Abridged-(A Harsha Sankar Article)

Dear Citizen, June 1998

All events that transpire in a public court of law are public issues. Our First Amendment rights as citizens must not be abridged or discouraged in publicizing the actions of the judiciary. There was an article in the Virginian Review Opinions section which in effect read that Microsoft Corporation should not take its case to the people. (It was sued by the Justice Department for allegedly violating federal anti-trust laws.) I firmly disagree with this statement because no entity should be censored. As long as an entity is truthful in what it is advocating, any attempts for censorship would be extremely harmful to this Constitutional Republic.

Courts, as guardian of the United States Constitution, are supposed to provide rulings for the protection of citizens’ sovereign rights. People’s rights to self government and liberty must not be infringed. The United States was and should be a free and open nation. The cloak of secrecy taking place in this nation’s courts is an abomination and it must be eliminated. Judicial sessions and its transactions must never be closed to the public. All meetings between judges, prosecutors, attorneys and litigants must be made public record (The only exception to this are certain aspects in criminal cases involving a juvenile).

The judiciary is one of the three branches of government. All its actions and any pertinent discussion to any pending or potentially pending cases must be subject to public review.

Please allow me to be more specific. It is widely rumored that many judges engage in the onerous practices of:

1. Discussing cases with attorneys in private and otherwise inappropriate settings.

2. Using citizens’ chambers as a shield to have cases privately litigated and at times even excluding the litigants.

3. Tolerating discussions of facts of criminal cases by prosecutors and defense attorneys to cut deals in times and settings other than the scheduled court sessions.


The Constitutional founders devised the United States to be a democracy with a republican system of government. Checks and balances were to be processed in order for individuals to have a representative voice in government. These practices by judges contradict this and the underlying concept that legitimate government is government by the consent of the governed. These deeds symbolize judicial oligarchy and the police state. The judicial aristocracy are implicated as co-conspirators by converting the people’s court into a private arbitration center.


This represents the huge wave of judicial activism in America in which the number of attorneys has quadrupled since 1970. The more attorneys this nation has, the more the average American will be treated with contempt for his/her lack of “legal” education. Ironically, it will cost the average American more to have his/her basic rights treated with less respect by its judiciary. Lawyer judges have seemed to forgotten in this day that the court have the primary responsibility to provide justice as defined by the strict application of the law. The only responsibility any citizen litigant must possess is simple truthfulness and not education.


In a democratic republic, a person must not be allowed to attain authority over the people by birthright, by non-representative appointment, or by education. Yet we have over a million unelected attorneys and countless regulators implementing laws and regulations governing the people. This destroys self-government. Whether a system is called fascism, communism, clergyism, or lawyerism, anytime the collective will of the people is negated, for whatever reasons, only corruption and graft will result.

Thank you for reading this letter. Please remember Americans owe it to the next generation to keep its government limited, representative and humane.


Very Truly Yours,
Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington,Virginia 24426

American Law and Justice-"What Traffic Can Bear"-By Harsha Sankar

Dear Citizen, December 1999

There have always been groups who twist the truth to serve their own purpose. These groups are not themselves productive, but they establish the rules and laws that permit them to control the groups that are productive. In this manner they achieve power and wealth. With this they buy politicians, bureaucrats, and media to further their agenda and/or to look the other way.

For men to live in peace with one another, they establish laws and voluntarily relinquish certain innate freedoms in order to make these laws work. When laws are not enforced, new laws multiply geometrically without the required result. Most new laws pass more power and wealth to those who make and enforce them. An incredible amount of lawyers have,by these laws, assured themselves of lifetime work.

In order to dissolve a marriage,the cost can be astronomical to those with a few holdings.The price seems to depend on “what the traffic can bear.” Far from helping to make an emotionally devastating event easier, the system compounds, complicates, and prolongs the proceedings so that distrust and even hate prevail where love once lived. Many people who have been involved in a dispute and turned to the legal system for help have found themselves in an endless morass of legal maneuvering that ends when the money is gone.

Delayed justice, postponed trials, minimal sentences, early parole and even increasing crime feed a system where a good policeman sees his dangerous work rewarded with release on a minuscule technicality or worse, a judge’s whim.

Honorable professions are being severely limited in their ability to provide reasonable services at reasonable prices. There is little these professions can do but comply with the huge paper work load imposed by the imperious bureaucracy.

The litany of abuses goes on and involves every segment of American life. While the concept of the “law” is correct, it is cleverly twisted to achieve the ambition of one select profession. Democracy and freedom are sweeping the nations of the world. Yet here in the first democracy, we find ourselves progressively enslaved by a profession composed of less than one-half of one percent of our people.

We first need criminal justice to make our lives safe. We do not need legal maneuvering that prolongs and weakens the process and saps the energy of the nation.

We need civil justice which will permit people to resolve their financial conflicts quickly, efficiently and in strict accordance to law. These conflicts should be based on economic loss. Big business, Big Government, and Big Media have forged an unholy alliance which has made small business the American dinosaur. One major reason why multi-national corporations have done well on Wall Street is because their competitors (family and individually owned businesses) have been squeezed ruthlessly. The only reason why high-tech has produced so many successful entrepreneurs is until recently they have been virtually untouched by high taxation,overregulations, and abusive litigation. However, this is about to change now that these parasitic forces have found new “blood” to feed on.

Our “legal-criminal-justice-system” is a failure! Everywhere there is increasing crime, overcrowded prisons, overtaxed courts, early parole, and endless litigation. Work ethics, personal responsibility, and free enterprise are being destroyed. We are being held hostage by a profession that fails our citizenry but controls our government. How can we expect an efficient and effective government when it is controlled by legislators trained in controversy and not trained in productivity and management?

The following steps should be taken.

1. Prohibit PAC, corporate, and union contributions to campaigns and political parties. Limit individual contributions to $2,000 to a campaign and $1,000 per year to a political party. Full disclosure must be provided.

2. Thoroughly de-license the legal profession.

3. All advocates in the judiciary must be phased out from the legislature,executive, and judgeships.
4. De-lawyer society through the buyout scheme and retrain them to be productive.

5. Repeal all laws, executive orders, court decisions, and Constitutional provisions that give government and courts admiralty jurisdiction (gold-fringe flag).

6. Re-confirmation of all judges by legislature for “good, competent behavior.”

7. Congress and state legislatures should be allowed to overturn any court decision with a 60 percent majority and executive consent.

We all have friends or family who are lawyers and whom we like personally. That does not mean they should run our government and our lives. We can change this chaos by not voting for lawyers and by voting for other worthy candidates.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar

908 Valley Ridge Road

Covington,Virginia 24426

How Americans Lost Their Rights (A Harsha Sankar Article)

Dear Citizen, May 1999

Millions of Americans have wondered:

1. Why judges seem to have unlimited authority without accountability?
2. Why the regulatory agencies have encroached on people’s lives, thereby persecuting harmless non-fraudulent people and simultaneously accomplishing little?
3. Why the democratic process has been destroyed by special interest influence (money and lawyers)?
4. Why American sovereignty is being surrendered to U.N., NATO, GATT, WTO,World Bank, and other independent international bureaucracies?
5. Why this nation’s charter, the Constitution of the United States, has no more application?
6. Why every year two million more new federal regulations and 150,000 new federal laws are created when this nation is already overburdened by innumerable laws which are vague and often contradictory?
7. Why legal procedures (rules of court), in addition to laws and regulations, are seemingly written in indecipherable code?

Encapsulated in this letter may be the reasons why. The Bill of Rights listed the restrictions that prevented any entity from placing a lien on the unalienable Rights born to all white Americans. This was in stark contrast with England and France because in those countries the monarchy was sovereign.

The 14^th Amendment, after it was illegally ratified in 1868 through coercion, declared all Americans are subjects to the federal government and they were the beneficiaries of this Amendment created charitable trust. However, they also became responsible for the debt.

The 14^th Amendment had nothing to do with enfranchising the freed slaves. In its guise, it started the enslavement of the entire American people to government. Unalienable rights come from the Creator. Civil Rights were created by the Feds. Any entity that gives a right can take it away.

The Constitution of the United States clearly states in Article 1, Section 10 that it cannot supersede the Obligation of Contracts.The 14^th Amendment was a contract between the federal government and the Americans that, in exchange for forfeiting their unalienable rights, the people would be the recipient of government monetary entitlements (enticements) and of limited liability.

Now that the Law was on hiatus, the notorious Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913. How many Americans have wondered why Congress has no authority over the Federal Reserve Bank despite the Constitution of the United States clearly giving it sole authority to coin money and thus regulate? Although the President is ultimately responsible for the Department of Treasury, he has no control over the FRB. The Federal Reserve is not a government institution but instead is a privately controlled branch of an international banking conglomerate which monopolizes the printing of U.S. currency. Why else does the dollar bill read “Federal Reserve Note” instead of “United States Treasury Note?” The debt is owed to an international banking cartel that is pushing for one-world government. No wonder on the $1 bill it is stated in Latin “New World Order.” No government can stay representative to its people if it takes part in this scheme.

In the 1930’s, the Gold Standard was suspended and so was the law since it meant no more sovereigns among the people. Prior to this, gold owners were sovereign. President Franklin Roosevelt then issued Executive Order Trading with the Enemy Act. The enemy, unfortunately, were the American people. Since they were outside the Law, they were adversarial to the Law.

On June 5^th, 1933, HJR 192 (48 stat. 113), Americans were then unknowingly moved to public policy, the charitable trust as loosely defined by the 14^th Amendment. In 1938 the Supreme Court, in Erie Railroad vs. Thomkins, ruled laws would no longer be “de jure” set in stone. They would now be “de facto,” mutable by will, and open to very loose interpretation by the judiciary under the ‘color’ of law. This U.S. Supreme Court decision gave judges unprecedented and near absolute power in the name of justice. People were now confirmed as being chattel in as much as soldiers are to the military. Since people were now bankrupt, they had no rights. When a “person” goes to court, his or her rights are not being adjudicated. Only his/her debt with the 14^th Amendment contract is being decided. The yellow/gold fringe flag determines jurisdiction to be admiralty/maritime. The private membership Bar will delicense any lawyer if this is disclosed.

In 1939, the Buck Act was passed. This made all individual states political subdivisions of the federal government when newly bankrupt states needed money. The states lost all autonomy.

In case anyone feels he or she has ownership rights, consider the following. Why are people compelled to continue to pay real estate and car taxes? What eventually happens if person does not pay these taxes? The answers are pretty clear. The title for a person’s car is in the state capitol and the deed to any real estate is possessed by the state courthouse. Birth certificates are with the U.S. Department of Commerce and with the Department of Vital Statistics. The person’s guardians are only given a birth certificate copy.

If all this does not make sense, consider that U.S. dollars since 1933 are only a contractual IOU the taxpayer-funded Treasury Department has with the Federal Reserve. A debt can only be passed on with an IOU. It cannot be relieved.

There are tangible solutions. According to Constitutional Law that has been upheld many times, if an individual owes nothing to the State, the State cannot interfere with that individual unless injury is inflicted. The most effective solution of most immediate concern is the effective removal of all attorneys from office. Only then can the preceding issues be adequately addressed. Without the end of same-hands governance, the preceding and all other issues become moot.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar

908 Valley Ridge Road

Covington,Virginia 24426

Founding Fathers Were Not Lawyers-By Harsha Sankar

Founding Fathers Were Not Lawyers-By Harsha Sankar- July 1999

Dear Citizen,

A myth that the Founding Fathers were lawyers needs to be disproved (attorney Frank W.Roger III’s May 15 guest essay, “Lawyers play a vital role in protecting citizens’ freedoms”).

Alexander Hamilton was a merchant and studied medicine.James Madison did postgraduate study in theology and considered going into the ministry. John Adams was a schoolmaster; Ben Franklin was a writer, printer, publisher and scientist. George Washington was an accomplished military leader.

Thomas Jefferson, a lawyer by education, had no direct role in framing or ratifying the Constitution. However, he stated: “The question will always be the same, and that is whether we will be ruled by self-government or by a small elite.” His fears are now realized. The law is whatever lawyers want it to be.

This nation was build on Judeo-Christian values. Jesus criticized lawyers severely for making the people’s laws their enterprise,for their hypocrisy by resorting to blackmail to advance justice, and for their subversions of simple truth and justice, and for passing judgment on work they never did.

Western civilization progressed when freedom, democracy, and personal responsibility reigned free. It regressed when aristocracy dominated.

Harsha Sankar

908 Valley Ridge Road

Covington,Virginia 24426

Separation Of Powers Needed Against Noiseless Thieves-By Harsha Sankar

Dear Citizen, December 1999

Originally, our Founding Fathers envisioned a “Government Of The People, By The People, and For The People” that included checks and balances on government powers.

The Separation of Powers doctrine basically states that there shall be a separation between the three branches of government, i.e. executive, legislative and judiciary. Neither branch could exercise the power of the other. The Federalist Papers (86-107) state the same sentiments.

The Sixth Amendment was clear in that it expressed that people were entitled to assistance of counsel. It contradicts the notions that only lawyers are qualified to represent people and that lawyers must be substituted in place of a citizen’s right to redress grievances. It the police were only allowed to possess guns, a police state would exist. In America, we have a lawyer oligarchy.

Today the judiciary branch usurps the power of all three branches by dominating every faction of the federal and state governments. The judiciary controls all branches through the various Bar Associations, Lawyer-legislators, lawyer-governors, and lawyers that write the laws also interpret the laws often to our detriment.

In the words of President Thomas Jefferson:

“The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become a venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated. “ Thomas Jefferson, 1821.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar

908 Valley Ridge Road

Covington,Virginia 24426

Dangerous Servant,Fearful Master (A Harsha Sankar Article)

Dear Citizen, July 1999

Self-government means democracy. This nation should be a democracy with a republic form of government and with an amendable constitution. The legal profession, in the guise of protecting individual rights, has destroyed democratic self-rule. They have severely infringed on the economic and personal freedoms of individuals as they have created a police state administrated by them.


Lawyers would have us to believe that the law should be left up to them and not the people because we as a group are not fit to govern our country. They frequently cite that democracy will lead to mobocracy and even socialism. In fact, only the reverse is true. Anarchy and tyranny exist because of elite lawyerism.


The common man, treated with contempt if he tries to exercise his unalienable Constitutional Rights by directly accessing his courts, is compelled by the lawyer-controlled government to instead seek entitlements (welfare) from it and the courts. Constantly politicians are promising people pork and economic benefits. They never promise people basic protections from property harm/theft and bodily harm by simplifying and concretizing the legal system, de-lawyering society, eliminating bribery (campaign contributions), and downsizing the parasitic, non-productive sectors of society. Too often pro-lawyer politicians pander to the emotions of some by continuing to pass laws that only deprive others of their rights. There is hardly any mention of dismantling the only monopoly (lawyer control of the judiciary), of the courts being regulated by a true citizen legislature, and of the need for judges to be bound by the law.


People must develop the self-discipline to not sell out to government (analogous to one selling his/her soul to the devil), to not allow government to divide and conquer, and instead demand government to protect our basic rights (by not profiting when others violate) and not interfere with our peaceful, non-fraudulent practices. George Washington once said “government can be a dangerous servant and fearful master.” With the explosive growth of attorneys and bureaucrats, his words are realized today.

Harsha Sankar

908 Valley Ridge Road

Covington, Virginia 24426

The Common Denominators Of Tyranny-By Harsha Sankar

The Common Denominators Of Tyranny

September 2011

Dear Citizen,

Judge Eldon Fallon divvied up $315 million to be paid to the plaintiffs' attorneys who worked on the litigation in the Vioxx settlement.

This sum was in addition to the more than $1.2 billion already paid to such attorneys. When that is added to the amount Merck paid to plaintiffs and for its own attorneys, the Vioxx litigation cost it more than $7 billion.

Islam has taken a central focus in many areas since 9/11. Islamic priests should not control all government and institutions in the Middle East.BAR attorneys should not dominate that here in the USA and in other nations.

In the name of enforcing a document, one can violate and pervert it. It is just a matter of picking the pills of poison.However, do citizens have to?

The word "lawyer" is harmless. Does the word "priest" threaten anyone? I think not.

Yet when the force of law and the power of politics is gained, only terror, oppression,and tyranny will triumph. There has to be a clear distinction between religion and politics.

There also has to be a clear distinction between law and politics. Isolated to themselves,the
clergy(legal or parochial) pose no threat to society. When they are mixed up in politics, they become combustible and heavy-handed.

In the name of helping people, elitist groups control people when force of law is involved.In the name of providing help, that specific help is monopolized by them. For example, in the name of providing assistance of counsel, the BAR monopolizes that and it clearly illegal for non-members to provide such. In the name of providing a "voice" for the people, professional lobbyists are shaping the laws. Since it is impossible to maintain a presence in the legislative and executive branches without having a presence in the imperial judiciary, all lobbyists groups are headed by BAR attorneys. The voice of the average citizen is drowned.

In the name of providing faith,priests in theocratic states dominate instead. Anytime anyone claims an exclusive or special domain to knowledge,ideas, and merits in any matter, liberties and rights are undermined. Progress and evolution stop because free flow of debate stop.

Tyranny always has its common denominators. Americans must be reminded of this as they reflect on the ten year anniversary of 9/11.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington,Virginia 24426

Rights Reduced To Privileges Due To Authoritarian Rule-By Harsha Sankar

Dear Citizen, December 2000

It appears that the next president will be decided by the “High Priests” in America's attorney-monopolized courts. How badly have America's state of affairs regressed? Rather than allowing the elected lawmakers in Florida hold an emergency session to create, change, and/or repeal a suitable law for this particular situation, Americans have to witness this critical matter handled by de facto and dictatorial judges.The People have also seen this whole election plunged into utter confusion, anarchy, and chaos by the legal profession who invariably stand to gain by raking in millions in attorney fees.

It is high time Americans realize that they live in a Bar Association dictatorship which is very similar to the communist and fascist party dictatorships in Cuba, in China, in the former Soviet Union, in Warsaw Pact nations, in Nazi Germany, in Mussolini’s Italy, in the banana republics of Latin America, and in the military dictatorships in Africa and some parts of Asia. This fact is obvious since the private “members only” bar associations totally control the judiciary and dominate both the legislative and executive branches Lawyers also control political parties, the media, corporations, government agencies and nonprofit organizations.

Rights have been reduced to privileges due to their authoritarian rule.Lawyers and pro-lawyer politicians and bureaucrats have reduced us, The People, to serfs and second-class citizens. We are no longer deemed fit and competent to advocate the claims and the law because of our lack of “legal education.” The Founding Fathers and the American Constitution stated clearly a citizen was entitled to assistance of counsel. The definition of counsel was not limited to Court Approved Bar Association “High Priests" attorneys. Counsel meant anyone the citizen litigant deemed appropriate for any kind of help.

The people are no longer free. Things are no longer done with their approval. In fact, only the reverse is true. The People can hardly do anything without their consent (lawyers’ advice with pro-lawyers serving as accomplices in this organized crime wave.) The “Dons,” “Godfathers,” and “Goodfellows” have taken the law into their own hands by telling people, through their advice and rulings, what the law is. Unless we pay them “protection” and “ransom” money, our rights have no meaning. Discretion equals dictatorship and the law is created, interpreted, and practiced at their whims and choosing. Lawyers have put themselves on a pedestal and simultaneously belittled us as their incapable subjects and wards. The Rule of Law must replace the Rule By Lawyers. The law should be applied and supported only.

There is no question the legal profession has converted American democracy into lootocracy.

Please read the following.

1. In the Paula Jones Lawsuit against the President in which she was awarded $850,000, she received only $151,000.

2. In the 368 billion dollar tobacco settlement, attorneys received one quarter (92 billion dollars) for their “fees.”

3. In a class action lawsuit against a computer monitor manufacturer, token plaintiffs received a $13 coupon. Their lawyers received $5.8 million in fees.

The list of outranges goes on. However, the real blame for this miserable muddle lies with the people themselves. They not only have allowed this to happen, but have have tried to profit from this. Many Americans really do not care what happens to America as long as they have their social lives, fun, money, status, and reputation. Americans somehow have placed style over substance, and they wonder why trust, values, patriotism, and tolerance are tearing apart at the seams.

Look at the forty and under generation. So few of them understand the rise of Bolshevism in Russia, the rise of Hitler and his manipulative tactics, the work of George Mason and Thomas Jefferson, the American Civil War, Franklin D Roosevelt’s policies and the eventual outcome, and the reasons why communism and other non-democratic ideologies have systematically failed.

During World war II, Americans actively advertised that the key to victory was production. Through production, America became the supreme economic and military power. It is ironic now that in the last two decades the younger generation has been trained to become non-productive predatory parasitic masters,corporate bureaucrats, or financial money changing marginalists. Americans must unleash their entrepreneurial spirit, which encourages the teaching and technical professions as well as that of the independent business operator. Danger and doom loom with wealth creation going overseas,with the relentless erosion of individual freedom,with the increased power of global agencies, and with the rise of a hostile, military power in China

The Glorification Of Oligarchists Must End-By Harsha Sankar

Dear Citizen, May 2000

Lawyers are government-licensed agents. The judiciary is a branch of government, along with the legislative and executive.It’s highly misleading when attorneys claim to challenge government authority when they are part of its establishment.

When attorneys state that they aren’t afraid of government, what are they risking (other than they may not collect their exorbitant fee)? When they win awards against government agencies, who really pays? The taxpayers!

People are tired of Hollywood and the media glorifying attorneys. If people want sincere reforms, they should obtain them through legislation and not litigation.

Very Truly Yours,

Harsha Sankar
908 Valley Ridge Road
Covington,Virginia 24426